|
When Maria Shriver filed for divorce earlier this month, in her petition she asked her soon to be ex-husband Arnold Schwarzenegger to pay spousal support and pay her attorney fees. Last week it was reported that he declined to do either. There’s been a turnaround in events, folks, and it looks like Maria will be taken care of. So what happened? As you know, Arnold and Maria’s youngest child, Christopher, was involved in a serious surfing accident last Sunday, July 17th, which left the 13-year-old with broken ribs, broken bones and a collapsed lung. He was in ICU for several days but is expected to be released some time this week. With both parents uniting to be with their son, Arnold left it to his attorney to handle paperwork in response to Maria’s filing. According to TMZ, Arnold signed the documents but only browsed through them as he was distracted with their son’s condition following the surfing accident. Hmm. Do you believe that story or do you think his change of heart was because of all the bad publicity he received for denying her support? Yeah, I believe the latter as well. Maria obviously was hurt that Arnold would deny [...] Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RightCelebrity/~3/3iL8Fuf_Ljw/ LeAnn Rimes Lauren German Kristen Bell Kristanna Loken The news story that gripped the world will now find a place on the big screen ? all thanks to a deal hashed out by producers and the men who spent 69 days trapped beneath the Atacama Desert. Before you snicker and roll your eyes with thoughts of a low budget, straight to DVD production, consider this: one of the men behind it actually worked on Shutter Island and Black Swan. Big time producer Mike Medavoy insists it will be more than a movie about them being stuck in the actual mine: ?We’ll dig deep into their stories ? We’re not just going to tell a story about 33 miners in a hole.” In fact, Medavoy is reportedly studying part of the material being produced by author Hector Tobar, who is currently working on a book about the melee. Again, for those who use the tired line ?well, we know how it ends, anyway? ? Tobar insists that there is a ?deep, textured story? involved. Smartly, the men who went through the ordeal, called ?los trienta y tres? (the 33), have the rights to any production related to their entrapment totally locked up. In an AP story published Monday, miner [...] Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/RightCelebrity/~3/wHfvxHYlw-4/ Jared Leto January Jones Janet Jackson Jamie Redknapp  | test | Jul 26, '11 11:56 AM
for everyone |
| [none] | Jul 26, '11 10:34 AM
for everyone |
Chris Brown has used homophobic slurs before, but says that's in the past, and a recent report claiming he used them during a basketball game is BS. A day after Star and Radar reported that Brown went off on another anti-gay rant, the oft-maligned R&B singer is sounding off, and he's not happy. Brown's rep calls Star's tale utterly false, saying he wasn't even ballin' that day and the photo Star used was months old - and from a video shoot. 
A totally fictitious article ran in the current Star magazine accusing our client Chris Brown of doing something that he did not do," says Brown's rep. "He got ticked off when things didn't go his way during the game, saying, 'That's gay!' and ‘You're a f-----t a--!' to the other players," Star claimed. Brown's side of the story? A little different. "He spent the entire day with dozens of members of the production team filming the video for 'Body to Body' at 1870 Sunset Paza in West Hollywood." "Star accompanied the fabricated story with a photo of Chris playing basketball in New York,s taken on the day of his F.A.M.E. CD release in March." "Chris Brown's management is considering taking appropriate legal action. We stand behind our client and want to set the record straight. This did not happen." We believe him, and are glad to hear it. Source: http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2011/07/chris-brown-denies-threatens-legal-action-over-latest-gay-slur-b/ Kim Yoon jin Kim Smith Kim Kardashian Kelly Ripa 
Are Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie really getting married? As in, within the next three months? A new report claims it's true, citing three different sources! We'll believe it when the "I dos" are exchanged, or the couple confirms the report themselves. Take Us Weekly's cover story with a grain of salt. Or 864. A wedding set to take place within the next few months, sources tell the celebrity news magazine, hinting at a small affair at their home in France ...  
Their wedding "would be intimate and informal," an insider says of the pair, who have been together for five years-plus but have resisted tying the knot. Jolie, 36, and Pitt, 47, have said that until marriage is legal for all - gay or straight - they won't partake. But that's likely just an excuse, however noble. It's more likely that they simply have their own reasons ... ones that may be evolving as the years go by. Six major factors may also play a role there. "The kids ask about marriage," Pitt said of Maddox, 9, Pax, 7, Zahara, 6, Shiloh, 5, and Vivienne and Knox, 3. "It's meaning more and more to them." Basically ... don't bet on this actually going down. But don't count it out either. What better reason than to do it for the kids, and for one another? Source: http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2011/07/brad-pitt-and-angelina-jolie-to-get-married-this-summer-for-real/ Tammin Sursok Steve Jones Simon Cowell Shannon Elizabeth |
